Rationing Organs for Religious Refuseniks
Patheos | Adam Lee
Since new medical advances always catch my attention, I read with interest this article about âbloodlessâ lung transplants being pioneered at some hospitals â" that is, salvaging and re-infusing the patientâs own blood, rather than relying on transfusions from donors. Itâs being sold as a cost-saving technique and a way to lessen the risk of allergic reactions or other rare side effects, plus it conserves donated blood so that more is available for emergencies. But the technique was developed for a different reason, which I bet you can guess:
Since new medical advances always catch my attention, I read with interest this article about âbloodlessâ lung transplants being pioneered at some hospitals â" that is, salvaging and re-infusing the patientâs own blood, rather than relying on transfusions from donors. Itâs being sold as a cost-saving technique and a way to lessen the risk of allergic reactions or other rare side effects, plus it conserves donated blood so that more is available for emergencies. But the technique was developed for a different reason, which I bet you can guess:
Ms. Tomczak, who was baptized at age 12 as a Jehovahâs Witness, insisted for religious reasons that her transplant be performed without a blood transfusion. The Witnesses believe that Scripture prohibits the transfusion of blood, even oneâs own, at the risk of forfeiting eternal life.I must be jaded, because the idea of a Jehovahâs Witness refusing blood and dying because of it doesnât shock me any more. But this story had a gut-wrenching twist: Rebecca Tomczak, the Witness whoâs the subject of the article, was adamant that she wanted the lung transplant, but not a blood transfusion, even at the cost of her own life. She forced her surgeon to agree that if there was a disaster, if she started to hemorrhage on the operating table, he had to stand back and let her die: Do you agree with Mr. Lee's position?
Comments
Post a Comment